Beste v. Saul
| Luann Kay Beste |
| Andrew Saul |
| 0:2019cv02585 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (kt) |
| Filing 10 (Text-only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Due to the passing of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-2585 KMM. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. (kt) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luann Kay Beste. Andrew Saul served on 10/15/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment 2)(KDS) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/29/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. (CLK) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 9/30/2019. (MME)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Karl E. Osterhout for Luann Kay Beste. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 9/25/2019. (NAH)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (CLK) |
| Filing 4 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau per Social Security List. Please use case number 19-cv-2585 SER. (CLK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7166411 filed by Luann Kay Beste. (Olson, Edward) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Luann Kay Beste. (Olson, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Luann Kay Beste. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beste v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luann Kay Beste | |
| Represented By: | Edward C. Olson |
| Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
