Soboyede v. Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. et al
| Akeem A Soboyede and Akeem A. Soboyede |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Rudy Luthers Hopkins Motors, Inc. d/b/a Luther Hopkins Honda, Ally Financial, Inc. and Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv02701 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. The Luther Holding Company d/b/a Luther Automotive Group is a corporate parent of Defendant Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc.. (Duncan, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc.. (Duncan, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Ally Financial, Inc.. (Newman, Patrick) |
Filing 14
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 1/7/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(KAT)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER on #8 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Ally Financial, Inc. answer due 11/19/2019; Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. answer due 11/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/6/2019. (KAT)
|
| Filing 12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Equifax is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Equifax Inc., which is a publicly traded company. (Running, Terri) Modified text on 11/6/2019 (MMG). |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 10 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Ally Financial, Inc.. (Newman, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Newman, Patrick) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, To Extend Time to Respond by Ally Financial, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Akeem Soboyede and Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc.. (Newman, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Colby B Lund on behalf of Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc.. (Lund, Colby) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Akeem A. Soboyede. Equifax Information Services LLC served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (Lyons, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Akeem A. Soboyede. Ally Financial, Inc. served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (Lyons, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Akeem A. Soboyede. Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. served on 10/16/2019, answer due 11/6/2019. (Lyons, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ally Financial, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-2701 (NEB/KMM). (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Trial Demanded against Ally Financial, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, Rudy Luther's Hopkins Motors, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7205358) filed by Akeem A Soboyede. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lyons, Thomas) Modified text on 10/15/2019 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
