King Technology, Inc. v. Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC
| King Technology, Inc. |
| Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC |
| 0:2019cv02887 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by King Technology, Inc.. Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC served on 1/2/2020, answer due 1/23/2020. (Pentelovitch, William) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC. (kt) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Request to Clerk's Office to Issue Summons for Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC. (Newby, Terrance) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by King Technology, Inc. re #7 Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (AO 120) (Newby, Terrance) |
| Filing 7 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Newby, Terrance) |
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael E. Ray for King Technology, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/14/2019. (NAH)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by King Technology, Inc. re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint, #4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael E. Ray. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7267755 (Pentelovitch, William) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael E. Ray. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7267755 filed by King Technology, Inc.. (Pentelovitch, William) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Copyright, Trademark) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-2887 NEB/KMM. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff King Technology, Inc.. (Pentelovitch, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7267637) filed by King Technology, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pentelovitch, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: King Technology, Inc. v. Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bio-Dex Laboratories, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: King Technology, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William Z Pentelovitch |
| Represented By: | Terrance C Newby |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Ray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
