Flis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cynthia Flis |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
0:2019cv02936 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David S Doty |
Becky R Thorson |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Jointly Signed by Cynthia Flis.(Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 11 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. MetLife, Inc. is a corporate parent of Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 9 ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 2/4/2020 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 12/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MSK) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel Keenan Ryan for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 12/16/2019. (JGK) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 11/21/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. (Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel K. Ryan. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7334992 filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ann Santos on behalf of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Santos, Margaret) |
Filing 4 ORDER Regarding Dispositive Motion Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 12/2/2019. (CLB) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (MTP) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 19-cv-2936 DSD/BRT. (MTP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7286756) filed by Cynthia Flis. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Merrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cynthia Flis | |
Represented By: | Merrick B Williams |
Represented By: | Stephen J Fields |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Alexander M Baggio |
Represented By: | Margaret Ann Santos |
Represented By: | Daniel Keenan Ryan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.