Zean v. Efinancial, LLC et al
Samuel Zean and Samuel Gaygbou Zean |
Efinancial, LLC, Burialexpense.com and SelectQuote Insurance Services |
0:2019cv02958 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Tony N Leung |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. filed by Samuel Gaygbou Zean. No summons requested. (Zean, Samuel) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of APPLICATION FOR PRO SE LITIGANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Samuel Zean is GRANTED e-filing privileges in this case. Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 5 and 7(d), Samuel Zean has consented to electronic service and has agreed to waive service by other means for all subsequent filings in this case, except when electronic service is not allowed under the rules. (JGK) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Burialexpense.com, Efinancial, LLC, SelectQuote Insurance Services. (JGK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burialexpense.com, Efinancial, LLC, SelectQuote Insurance Services (filing fee $400, receipt number 4-105458) filed by Samuel Zean. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet SelectQuote Insurance Services, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Burialexpense.com, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Efinancial LLC) (JGK) Document QC'd on 12/10/2019 by LPH (LPH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.