Kobs v. Paul Davis Restoration of Greater St. Paul, MN
| Mitchell Kobs |
| Paul Davis Restoration of Greater St. Paul, MN |
| 0:2019cv03033 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| John R Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 2/20/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 12/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(BJP)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Paul Davis Restoration of Greater St. Paul, MN. (Brandt, Angela) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Paul Davis Restoration of Greater St. Paul, MN. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-3033 JRT/KMM. (CLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Paul Davis Restoration of Greater St. Paul, MN (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7318320) filed by Mitchell Thomas Kobs. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kitzer, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
