Dawson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Randy Dawson |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv03123 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Cancelation of Hearing: The pretrial conference set for 1/23/2020 before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson is canceled. (MSK) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Randy Dawson (Chester, Anthony) |
Filing 9
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (STP) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 1/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MSK)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. answer due 1/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 12/20/2019. (MSK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL AND DIRECTION TO THE CLERK OF COURT FOR REASSIGNMENT OF CASE. Judge Eric C. Tostrud recused. Case reassigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-3123 JRT/BRT. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 12/20/2019. (CLK)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Randy Dawson. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 19-cv-3123 ECT/BRT. (CLK) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Experian plc is a corporate parent of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Meeker County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7351292) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dawson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Randy Dawson | |
| Represented By: | Anthony P Chester |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory J Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
