Kuhl v. U.S. Bank, NA
| Mari Kuhl |
| U.S. Bank, NA |
| 0:2019cv03163 |
| December 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/16/2020. Fact Discovery due by 9/17/2020. Expert Discovery due by 12/14/2020. Motions (non-disp) due 9/17/2020. Motions (disp) due by 2/15/2021. Ready for trial due by 7/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 2/14/2020. (KAT)
|
|
Filing 10
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE:Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/18/2020 at 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Call-in instructions will be emailed to counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 2/14/2020. (KAT)
|
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 2/13/2020. Scheduling Order to be issued. (KAT) Modified text and file date on 2/19/2020 (MMG). |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by U.S. Bank, NA. Jointly Signed by Mari Kuhl.(Nodes, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 2/13/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(BJP)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-3163 DWF/KMM. (MMG) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by U.S. Bank, NA re #2 Declaration, #4 Answer to Complaint, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Nodes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint filed by U.S. Bank, NA. (Nodes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. U.S. BANCORP is a corporate parent of Defendant U.S. Bank, NA. (Nodes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jeff Brockmann re #1 Notice of Removal, by U.S. Bank, NA . (Nodes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ramsey County, case number 62-CV-19-9069 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7357814) filed by U.S. Bank, NA. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nodes, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kuhl v. U.S. Bank, NA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bank, NA | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A Nodes |
| Represented By: | Janet M Olawsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mari Kuhl | |
| Represented By: | Karl E Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
