Walker v. Royal Credit Union et al
| Daniel M. Walker |
| Royal Credit Union and Minnesota Repossessors, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv03189 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Minnesota Repossessors, Inc., Royal Credit Union. (KDS) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-3189 DWF/KMM. (KDS) |
| (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Donovan W. Frank's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these practice pointers, in addition to the District of Minnesota's Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (las) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Minnesota Repossessors, Inc., Royal Credit Union (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7363281) filed by Daniel M. Walker. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Strauss, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
