Securities Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities Exchange Commission
Defendant: Direct Lending Investments, LLC
Case Number: 0:2019mc00024
Filed: April 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous civil case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER from the Central District of California, case number 2:19-cv-2188 DSF (MRWx) (filing fee $47, receipt number 44641102787). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Notice of Receivership, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope) (MMP) Document QC'd by KMH on 4/22/2019 (KMH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities Exchange Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Direct Lending Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?