Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC v. Cirrus Design Corporation
| Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC |
| Cirrus Design Corporation |
| 0:2019mc00036 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Michael J Davis |
| Miscellaneous civil case |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 DECLARATION of David Y. Trevor in Opposition to #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Cirrus Design Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - H)(Trevor, David) |
| Filing 30 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Cirrus Design Corporation. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Trevor, David) |
Filing 29
ORDER on #27 Stipulation - Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Cirrus Design Corporation's time to respond to the Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs #22 shall be extended up to and including August 14, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 8/8/2019. (JLB)
|
| Filing 28 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #27 Stipulation. (Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 27 STIPULATION to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs by Cirrus Design Corporation. Jointly signed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Towns, Tiana) Modified text on 8/8/2019 (CLK). |
| Filing 26 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Cirrus Aviation Services LLC's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs #22 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 25 Declaration of Aaron Mills Scott in Support of #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D)(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs : Motion Hearing set for 9/9/2019 at 10:00 AM in Edward J. Devitt Courtroom (STP) before Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of Aaron Mills Scott re #20 Request by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) D)(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 20 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-INCORRECT EVENT-DIRECTED TO REFILE AS MOTION. REQUEST for Attorney's Fees and Costs by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Scott, Aaron) Modified text on 7/29/2019 (lmb). |
|
Filing 19
ORDER denying #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 7/2/2019. (JLB)
|
| Filing 18 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois: Motion Hearing held on 6/24/2019 re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Design Corporation. (TB) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by David Y Trevor on behalf of Cirrus Design Corporation. (Trevor, David) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Cirrus Design Corporation re #4 Notice of Hearing on Motion (Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Alan Klapmeier in Opposition to #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC.(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Mark Connot in Opposition to #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC.(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) : Motion Hearing set for 6/24/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (DUL) before Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Bevilacqua, Theresa) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY #3 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Cirrus Design Corporation's Motion to Stay Deposition Pending Hearing is GRANTED, and the deposition of Alan Klapmeier is hereby stayed until further order of the Court pursuant to Cirrus Design Corporation's Pending Motion to Quash Subpoena. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/19/2019. (GRR)
|
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Mark Connot in Opposition to #3 MOTION to Stay re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Stay re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC.(Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Mills Scott on behalf of Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC. (Scott, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Motion for Stay #3 Motion to Stay. (Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 6 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #3 Motion to Stay filed by Cirrus Design Corporation.(Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION to Stay re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Design Corporation.(Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #3 MOTION to Stay re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) : Date and time to be determined. (Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay re #1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878) filed by Cirrus Design Corporation. (Towns, Tiana) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Miscellaneous list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 19-mc-36 MJD/LIB. (kt) |
| Filing 1 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6942878). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Quash and for Protective Order, #2 Declaration of Theresa M. Bevilacqua, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Affidavit of Service) (Bevilacqua, Theresa) Modified text on 6/19/2019 (LPH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC v. Cirrus Design Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cirrus Aviation Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Mills Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cirrus Design Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Theresa M Bevilacqua |
| Represented By: | Tiana Towns |
| Represented By: | David Y Trevor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
