Zuk v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| June Zuk |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv00027 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by June Zuk (Chester, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by June Zuk (Chester, Anthony) |
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Callie Barr for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 1/6/2020. (NAH)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Callie Barr as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (CLK) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (5th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 20-cv-27 JRT/LIB. (CLK) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Callie Barr. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7372692 (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Callie Barr. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7372692 filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Experian PLC is a corporate parent of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) Modified text on 1/3/2020 (MTP). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Crow Wing County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7372642) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zuk v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: June Zuk | |
| Represented By: | Anthony P Chester |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory J Myers |
| Represented By: | Callie Barr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
