KGP Telecommunications, LLC v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
| KGP Telecommunications, LLC |
| Ervin Cable Construction, LLC |
| 0:2020cv00114 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
(Text-Only) NOTICE of Resetting of Hearing: The Pretrial Conference scheduled for 3/11/2020 is RESCHEDULED for 3/12/2020 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 3C (STP) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (TMA)
|
|
Filing 9
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. Jointly Signed by KGP Telecommunications, LLC f/k/a KGP Telecommunications, Inc. and Ervin Cable Construction, LLC.(Seiler, Quin)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by John C Holper on behalf of Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. (Holper, John)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/4/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 3/11/2020 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 3C (STP) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 1/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint filed by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. (McBride, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER on #3 Stipulation. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC answer or otherwise respond due date: 1/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 1/17/2020. (TMA)
|
|
Filing 4
PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #3 Stipulation. (Seiler, Quin)
|
|
Filing 3
STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. Jointly Signed by KGP Telecommunications, LLC f/k/a KGP Telecommunications, Inc. and Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. (Seiler, Quin)
|
|
Filing 2
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-114 (PJS/ECW). (lmb)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Rice County (filing fee $400, receipt number AMNDC-7387279) filed by Ervin Cable Construction, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Seiler, Quin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KGP Telecommunications, LLC v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ervin Cable Construction, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Matthew R McBride |
| Represented By: | Quin C. Seiler |
| Represented By: | John C Holper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KGP Telecommunications, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan A Olson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
