Nordling v. Northern States Power Company et al
| Gale K. Nordling |
| Northern States Power Company and Xcel Energy Inc. |
| 0:2020cv00337 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| John R Tunheim |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 RESPONSE in Opposition re #19 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 36 DECLARATION of Gale K. Nordling in Opposition to #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Gale K. Nordling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Redacted Correspondence)(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 35 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Gale K. Nordling. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Jensen, Thomas) |
Filing 34
ORDER on #32 Stipulation. The date by which Defendants must reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #19 shall be extended to March 23, 2020. The date by which Plaintiff must reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment #25 shall be extended to March 23, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 3/23/2020. (JLB)
|
| Filing 33 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #32 Stipulation. (Fitzpatrick, Margaret) |
| Filing 32 STIPULATION To Extend Time by Xcel Energy Inc.. Jointly Signed by Gale K. Nordling, Xcel Energy Inc., and Northern States Power Company. (Fitzpatrick, Margaret) |
| Filing 31 (Text-Only) NOTICE TO ATTORNEY regarding Dispositive Motions briefing schedule: All dispositive motions must comply with Local Rule 7.1(c). Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed with the Court on or before 21 days after the service of the supporting memorandum to the original motion. Replies to responsive briefs shall be filed 14 days after the service of the response to the dispositive motion. Upon the motion being fully briefed and filed, counsel for the moving party shall email Chief Judge Tunheims chambers at Tunheim_Chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov to request a hearing date. Upon receiving from Chief Judge Tunheims Courtroom Deputy a hearing date, time and location, the moving party shall file the amended notice of hearing at that time. (HAZ) |
| Filing 30 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc..(Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 29 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #25 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc..(Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 28 Declaration of Deborah A. Robin in Support of #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D)(Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 27 MEMORANDUM in Support re #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #25 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Date and time to be determined. (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Xcel Energy Inc.. (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 24 LR7.1/LR72.2 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Gale K. Nordling re #23 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Gale K. Nordling.(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #19 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Gale K. Nordling.(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 22 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #19 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Gale K. Nordling.(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #19 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Gale K. Nordling.(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 20 First Declaration of Gale K. Nordling in Support of #19 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Gale K. Nordling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E)(Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Gale K. Nordling. (Jensen, Thomas) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REMAND MOTION: that Plaintiff's deadline to file a motion to remand shall be extended to February 27, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 2/21/2020. (MMP)
|
| Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #16 Stipulation,. (Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION re #15 Order on Stipulation, Joint Stipulation to Extend Time by Gale K. Nordling. Jointly Signed by Gale K. Nordling, Northern States Power Company, a MN Corporation, and Xcel Energy Inc., a MN corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Northern States Power Company. (Jensen, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER on #12 Stipulation. 1. The parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time [Docket No. 12] is APPROVED; and 2. Defendants' time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to February 27, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 2/21/2020. (JLB)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 13 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-WILL REFILE. ROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Holly, Andrew) Modified text on 2/21/2020 (lmb). |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by Northern States Power Company, Xcel Energy Inc.. Jointly Signed by Gale K. Nordling, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Northern States Power Company. (Holly, Andrew) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to February 24, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 2/10/2020. (MMP)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 Stipulation. (Lucke, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Xcel Energy Inc.. Jointly Signed by Northern States Power Company and Gale K. Nordling. (Lucke, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Fitzpatrick on behalf of All Defendants. (Fitzpatrick, Margaret) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas D Jensen on behalf of Gale K. Nordling. (Jensen, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Xcel Energy Inc. re #3 Exhibit, #4 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (6th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 20-cv-337 JRT/LIB. (CLK) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Xcel Energy Inc. (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Northern States Power Company). (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Holly, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-WILL REFILE UPDATED DOCUMENT. EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal. (Holly, Andrew) Modified text on 1/24/2020 (lmb). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7428020) filed by Xcel Energy Inc. (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Northern States Power Company). No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Holly, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
