Katzung et al v. Distinctive Communications, Inc.
| David Manderson and Chad Katzung |
| Distinctive Communications, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv00417 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Distinctive Communications, Inc. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 20-cv-417 ECT/BRT. (CLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Distinctive Communications, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number BMNDC-7445481) filed by David Manderson(as Trustees of the South Central Minnesota Electrical Workers' Retirement and 401(k) Plan), Chad Katzung(as Trustees of the South Central Minnesota Electrical Workers' Family Health Plan), Chad Katzung(as Trustees of the South Central Minnesota Joint Apprenticeship Committee for the Electrical Industry Trust Fund), Chad Katzung(and each of their successors), David Manderson, David Manderson, David Manderson, Chad Katzung, David Manderson, Chad Katzung(as Trustees of the South Central Minnesota Electrical Workers' Retirement and 401(k) Plan). Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cefalu, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
