Hillesheim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Gregory Hillesheim |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
0:2020cv00533 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Hildy Bowbeer |
Wilhelmina M Wright |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 6/16/2020 at 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Amended Pleadings due by 5/26/2020. Fact Discovery due by 12/1/2020. Expert Discovery due by 2/1/2021. Motions (non-disp) due 12/15/2020. Motions (disp) due by 4/1/2021. Ready for trial due by 8/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/8/2020. (JMK) |
Filing 10 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. regarding Agreement for Plaintiff to Respond to any Rule35 IME Report Produced by Defendant. (Nyquist, Katherine) |
Filing 9 Minute Entry for Initial Pretrial Scheduling Conference held by telephone before Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/3/2020. The parties will meet and confer further about the schedule for expert disclosures, specifically with regard to the deadline for disclosing the report of Defendant's anticipated Rule 35 medical examination, and will e-file a joint letter on or before April 7, 2020, with their proposal. The Court will defer entry of a scheduling order until after receipt of that letter. (JMK) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Jointly Signed by Gregory Hillesheim.(Nyquist, Katherine) |
Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ORDER - PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE: The District of Minnesota, in recognition of current efforts locally and nationally to protect persons from unnecessary potential exposure to COVID-19, is monitoring The Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and State of Minnesota guidance. Accordingly, in order to limit the potential for exposure due to travel by counsel and parties, the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, scheduled for April 3, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. CDT, in this case will be held by telephone. A call-in number will be provided by separate e-mail prior to the conference. If the parties, or their counsel, believe that going forward with the Pretrial Scheduling Conference by telephone is not advisable or necessary, the parties may file a short joint letter with their alternative proposals. The parties have this Court's permission to file letters regarding concerns relating to COVID-19 pursuant to this Text Order. The parties are not required to conduct any applicable meet and confers in person. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 3/13/2020. (JMK) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/27/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6B (STP) before Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 2/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(JMK) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Robbins, Holly) |
Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Robbins, Holly) |
(Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have been recently revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (JMK) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 20-cv-533 WMW/HB. (CLK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ramsey County, case number 62-CV-20-588 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7489854) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Robbins, Holly) |
(Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hillesheim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Katherine Nyquist |
Represented By: | Holly M Robbins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gregory Hillesheim | |
Represented By: | Patrick V Johnson |
Represented By: | George E. Warner, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.