Hatley-Shultz v. Trans Union LLC
| Karen Hatley-Shultz |
| Trans Union LLC |
| 0:2020cv00626 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 5/19/2020 at 01:00 PM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 3/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (MSK)
|
| Filing 9 TRANS UNION, LLC'S ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by Trans Union LLC. (Blair, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karen Hatley-Shultz. Trans Union LLC served on 3/5/2020, answer due 3/26/2020. (Bursell, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Christopher Blair for Trans Union LLC. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 3/16/2020. (NAH)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher L. Blair. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7557683 filed by Trans Union LLC. (Fisher, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. is a corporate parent of Defendant Trans Union LLC. TransUnion is a corporate parent of Defendant Trans Union LLC. (Fisher, Bradley) |
| (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Trans Union LLC. (MTP) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 20-cv-00626 WMW/BRT. (MTP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey J Bursell on behalf of Karen Hatley-Shultz. (Bursell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Trans Union LLC (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7519384) filed by Karen Hatley-Shultz. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bursell, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hatley-Shultz v. Trans Union LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trans Union LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Blair |
| Represented By: | Bradley D Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Hatley-Shultz | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey J Bursell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
