Colvin v. Hennepin County Attorneys' Office et al
| Brenda Calloway Colvin |
| Hennepin County Child Protection, The City of Plymouth and Hennepin County Attorneys' Office |
| 0:2020cv00639 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hildy Bowbeer |
| David S Doty |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order, failing which the Court will treat the present Complaint [Doc. No. 1] as the operative pleading in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/24/2020. (JMK)
|
| Filing 10 SEALED EXHIBIT Removal Witness 1 re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 9 SEALED EXHIBIT removal Kellie Syrng Testimony re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 8 SEALED EXHIBIT Removal Claire Neissen-Derry Testimony re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 7 SEALED EXHIBIT Complaint 3 REMOVAL re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 6 SEALED EXHIBIT Medical Emergency Minn. Stat. 626.556 Complaint 2 re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 5 SEALED EXHIBIT EXHIBITS MInn. Stat. 626.556 Complaint 1 re #4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Colvin.(Colvin, Brenda) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 28 U.S.C. 1441 Removal - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Brenda Calloway Colvin. ATTACHMENTS FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 LR 7.1 Compliance PRE, #3 Prelim. Injunc. Memorandum, #4 Removal Memorandum, #5 Certifcate of Service, #6 LR Compliance REM)(Colvin, Brenda) Modified text on 3/13/2020 (MMP). |
| (Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have been recently revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (JMK) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of APPLICATION FOR PRO SE LITIGANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Brenda Colvin is GRANTED e-filing privileges in this case. Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 5 and 7(d), Brenda Colvin has consented to electronic service and has agreed to waive service by other means for all subsequent filings in this case, except when electronic service is not allowed under the rules. (NAH) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Brenda Colvin. (NAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hennepin County Attorneys' Office, Hennepin County Child Protection, The City of Plymouth filed by Brenda Colvin. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (NAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
