SYT Solutions, LLC et al v. Burger et al
| Kris Lindemann, Brian Lindemann and SYT Solutions, LLC |
| The ADvantage Companies, Inc., Cris Burger, Lisa Burger, David McGowan and Advantage Tape Receivables, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv00794 |
| March 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| John R Tunheim |
| Contract: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Advantage Tape Receivables, Inc., Cris Burger, Lisa Burger, David McGowan, The ADvantage Companies, Inc.. (KNK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-794 (JRT/KMM). (KNK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advantage Tape Receivables, Inc. f/k/a Advantage Tape Advertising, Inc., Cris Burger, Lisa Burger, David McGowan, The ADvantage Companies, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7588144) filed by Kris Lindemann, Brian Lindemann, SYT Solutions, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rabuse, Dwight) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
