Green v. Chamberlain Home Owners Association
Carl Green |
Chamberlain Home Owners Association |
0:2020cv00798 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Becky R Thorson |
John R Tunheim |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 5/15/2020.(MSK) |
Filing 12 (Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. Due to the pending motion to dismiss, there is good cause to delay setting a pretrial conference at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 5/12/2020.(MSK) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chamberlain Home Owners Association re #10 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #8 Meet and Confer Statement, #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General , #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #9 Proposed Order to Judge, #7 Affidavit in Support of Motion (Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Date and time to be determined. (Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Chamberlain Home Owners Association.(Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #5 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Chamberlain Home Owners Association.(Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Nigel H Mendez in SUPPORT OF #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Chamberlain Home Owners Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s))(Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Chamberlain Home Owners Association. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Chamberlain Home Owners Association. (Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nigel H Mendez on behalf of Chamberlain Home Owners Association. (Mendez, Nigel) |
Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk's Office re: Filing Fee. cc: Green w/ IFP application. (JGK) |
Filing 2 Conventional Summons Issued as to Chamberlain Home Owners Association. (JGK) Document QC'd on 3/31/2020 (JGK). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chamberlain Home Owners Association (filing fee $400, receipt number 3-1015919) filed by Carl Green. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) Document QC'd on 3/31/2020 (JGK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Green v. Chamberlain Home Owners Association | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chamberlain Home Owners Association | |
Represented By: | Nigel H Mendez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carl Green | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.