Gfroerer et al v. Menard, Inc.
| Sherryl Gfroerer and Jon Gfroerer |
| Menard, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv00812 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. On 5/11 and 5/12/2020, the parties electronically filed their initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1). However, under Rule 5(d)(1), initial disclosures, like certain discovery requests and responses, must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding (e.g., in connection with a motion) or the court orders the filing. The parties should comply with Rule 5(d)(1) for the duration of this proceeding. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 5/13/2020.(BJP)
|
|
Filing 14
DISCLOSURES Menard's Initial Disclosures by Menard, Inc..(Singel, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 13
DISCLOSURES Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures by Jon Gfroerer, Sherryl Gfroerer. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Rule 26.01(a) Initial Disclosures)(Rochlin, Pamela)
|
|
Filing 12
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE: Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/4/2020 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Call-in instructions will be emailed to counsel. Prior to the call, the parties are required to engage in additional direct settlement negotiations, including the exchange of additional demands and offers, in a sincere effort to resolve this case without further litigation. Counsel must be prepared to discuss the status of those discussions with the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 5/5/2020.(KAT) Modified text on 5/5/2020 (KAT).
|
|
Filing 11
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/12/2020. Fact Discovery due by 12/11/2020. Expert Discovery due by 5/21/2021. Motions (non-disp) due 1/15/2021. Motions (disp) due by 5/21/2021. Ready for trial due by 9/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 5/5/2020.(KAT)
|
|
Filing 10
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 4/28/2020.(KAT)
|
|
Filing 9
PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Singel, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION for Protective Order by Menard, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Sherryl Gfroerer. (Singel, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Menard, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Sherryl Gfroerer.(Singel, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Menard, Inc.. filed by Sherryl Gfroerer, Jon Gfroerer. No summons requested. (Rochlin, Pamela)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint Answer to Amended Complaint filed by Menard, Inc.. (Singel, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER SEEKING 26(f) REPORT DURING COVID-19 OUTBREAK: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/28/2020. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 3/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(KAT)
|
|
Filing 2
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-812 SRN/KMM. (KDS)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court, case number Not yet assigned (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7594722) filed by Menard, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Singel, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
