Cavan v. United States of America et al
| Seui Cavan |
| Ms. Voss, Mr. Armstrong, Dr. Bennett, Ms. Shaw, Mr. Weber, Warden Marques, Capt Swan, United States of America, Mr. Roloff, David McKee and Ms. Lavalley |
| 0:2020cv01072 |
| May 1, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Seui Cavan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Inmate Inquiry)(JGK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Armstrong, Bennett, Lavalley, Marques, David McKee, Roloff, Shaw, Swan, United States of America, Voss, Weber filed by Seui Cavan. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 5th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
