Merrick v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| 0:2020cv01154 |
| May 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Taylor Grode. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7719916 (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Taylor Grode. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7719916 filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Experian PLC is a corporate parent of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7719846) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Consent Form USAA Federal Savings Bank, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Merrick v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
