Roca v. Church et al
| Keith Michael Roca |
| Rebecca Church, Alyssa Passehl, Sara M Carrels, Alyssa Passehl Doing Business as Case Worker for Winona County, Sara M Carrels Doing Business as Guardian Ad Litem Third Judicial District of Minnesota and Rebecca Church Doing Business as Assistant Winona County Attorney |
| 0:2020cv01228 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Keith Michael Roca re #9 Objection to Report and Recommendations, #10 Notice of Hearing. (kt) Document QC'd on 7/2/2020 (CLK). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING by Keith Michael Roca re #9 Objection to Report and Recommendations: time and date t.b.d. (kt) Document QC'd on 7/2/2020 (CLK). |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION TO #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Keith Michael Roca. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Envelope)(kt) Document QC'd on 7/2/2020 (CLK). |
Filing 8
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE in regards to #7 Motion to Reconsider. Magistrate Judge Menendez has reviewed the document filed by plaintiff (ECF No. 7). The document is captioned as a motion for reconsideration, however, the plaintiff has not received permission to file a motion for reconsideration. D. Minn. LR 7.1(j). Accordingly, the Court will not reconsider its report and recommendation. However, no prior permission is required for a party to file objections to a magistrate judges R&R, so it is possible the District Court may deem it appropriate to consider this document an objection under D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/22/2020.(KAT)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Keith Michael Roca. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmb) Document QC'd on 7/17/2020 (JGK). |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Keith Michael Roca, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Keith Michael Roca. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/8/2020.(KAT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #5 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Keith Michael Roca: Date and time to be determined. (MMP) Modified text on 6/19/2020 (MMP). |
| Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Injunctive Relief filed by Keith Michael Roca. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(MMP) Modified text on 6/19/2020 (MMP). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING ALL DISPOSITIVE AND NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS to Magistrate Judge Menendez Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/22/2020.(las)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Keith Michael Roca. (JGK) Document QC'd on 6/12/2020 (JGK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sara M Carrels, Rebecca Church, Alyssa Passehl filed by Keith Michael Roca. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Kate M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Additional Facts 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Additional Facts 2, #3 Exhibit(s) Additional Facts 3, #4 Exhibit(s) Evidence of State Medical Approval, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Envelope) (JGK) FIRST, THIRD AND FOURTH ATTACHMENTS RESTRICTED PER JUDGE MENENDEZ'S CHAMBERS. (kt) Document QC'd on 6/12/2020 (JGK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
