Lopez et al v. Barr et al
| Yeriel Ramirez Torres, Franklin Lopez and Samuel Martinez Lopez |
| Ryan R. Wood, United States of America, the, Executive Office for Immigration Review, William P. Barr, Chad F. Wolf and James McHenry |
| 0:2020cv01330 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| John R Tunheim |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to William P. Barr, Executive Office for Immigration Review, James McHenry, United States of America, the, Chad F. Wolf, Ryan R. Wood. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 20-cv-1330 (JRT/BRT). (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Executive Office for Immigration Review, James McHenry, United States Attorney General, United States of America, Chad F. Wolf, Ryan R. Wood (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7785113) filed by Samuel Martinez Lopez, Yeriel Ramirez Torres, Franklin Lopez. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
