United States of America v. Berry
United States of America |
Marcus Anthony Berry |
0:2020cv01360 |
June 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 4246 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Marcus Anthony Berry consenting to Zoom hearing. (Mohrlant, Karen) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only) ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Counsel has been appointed to represent Mr. Berry. On or before 7/21/2020, counsel should advise the Court through a letter filed on ECF regarding whether Mr. Berry will consent to attend a hearing by Zoom, during which counsel for Mr. Berry could be at FMC with her client, and the rest of the participants would attend remotely. If additional time is needed for counsel to make this determination, she should file a letter request to that effect on ECF. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 7/1/2020.(KAT) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR CONTINUED SEALING. Sealing GRANTED for Document Number(s): Exhibit D to the Petition, until further Order of the Court. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 7/1/2020. (KAT) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Letter to Magistrate Judge. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 7 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by United States of America . (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 6 ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY Karen E Mohrlant for Marcus Anthony Berry Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/30/2020.(MKB) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-1360 (SRN/KMM). (MKB) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #2 Exhibit, #1 Petition (in a Civil Case), #3 Statement instead of Redacted Document (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT INSTEAD OF REDACTED DOCUMENT: Impracticable to Redact for #2 Sealed Document(s) - Docket # 2 - Personal Health Information . (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBIT D re #1 Petition (in a Civil Case), by United States of America. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 1 PETITION against Marcus Anthony Berry filed by United States of America. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) E, #5 Exhibit(s) F, #6 Exhibit(s) G, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Berry | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Marcus Anthony Berry | |
Represented By: | Karen E Mohrlant |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Friedrich A. P. Siekert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.