Salpatorie v. Winkel et al
Samuel Leek Salpatorie |
Joseph Larson, Chad Winkel and Catherine Anne Wood |
0:2020cv01479 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samuel Leek Salpatorie re #5 Memorandum, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Samuel Leek Salpatorie, #4 MOTION , #3 Notice (Other), #1 Prisoner Complaint, (JGK) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM re #1 Prisoner Complaint, filed by Samuel Leek Salpatorie. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(JGK) |
Filing 4 MOTION filed by Samuel Leek Salpatorie. (JGK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE (Blank Appeal Form) by Samuel Leek Salpatorie (JGK) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Samuel Leek Salpatorie. (JGK) |
Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against Joseph Larson, Chad Winkel, Catherine Anne Wood filed by Samuel Leek Salpatorie. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Envelope) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.