Watson v. State of Minnesota et al

Watson v. State of Minnesota et al

Petitioner:	William Watson
Respondent:	Magistrate Jeannice M. Reding, Amy Blagoev, Hennepin County District Court Fourth Judicial District and State of Minnesota
Case Number:	0:2020cv01537
Filed:	July 8, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge:	Leo I Brisbois
Referring Judge:	David S Doty
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
August 12, 2020	Filing 4 LEGAL NOTICE by William Watson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MKB) Document QC'd on 8/21/2020 (JGK).
July 27, 2020	Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan P Schmidt on behalf of Amy Blagoev, State of Minnesota. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schmidt, Jonathan)
July 13, 2020	Filing 2 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Amy Blagoev, Hennepin County District Court Fourth Judicial District, Jeannice M. Reding, State of Minnesota Attorney Substitution. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution)(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
July 8, 2020	Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 3-016003) filed by William Watson. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Envelope) (JGK) Document QC'd on 7/16/2020 (JGK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. State of Minnesota et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Magistrate Jeannice M. Reding
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Represented By:	Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Amy Blagoev
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Represented By:	Jonathan P Schmidt
Represented By:	Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Hennepin County District Court Fourth Judicial District
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Represented By:	Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Represented By:	Jonathan P Schmidt
Represented By:	Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Watson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?