Pro-Troll Inc. v. Proking Spoon LLC et al
Pro-Troll Inc. |
Proking Spoon LLC and KMDA, Inc. |
0:2020cv01576 |
July 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Leo I Brisbois |
Eric C Tostrud |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Wilcox on behalf of Pro-Troll Inc.. (Wilcox, Christopher) |
Filing 17 REPLY to Counterclaim filed by Pro-Troll Inc.. (Wilcox, Christopher) |
Filing 16 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to KMDA, Inc., Proking Spoon LLC. (CLK) |
Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Peter Tormey for Pro-Troll Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 9/10/2020. (NAH) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Peter J. Tormey. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number BMNDC-8041391 filed by Pro-Troll Inc.. (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. filed by Pro-Troll Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-D) (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Cara S Donels for KMDA, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 8/21/2020. (NAH) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Cara S. Donels. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7986849 filed by KMDA, Inc., KMDA, Inc.. (Niederluecke, Kurt) |
Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant KMDA, Inc., Counter Claimant KMDA, Inc.. (Niederluecke, Kurt) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Pro-Troll Inc.. filed by KMDA, Inc.. (Niederluecke, Kurt) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pro-Troll Inc.. KMDA, Inc. served on 7/30/2020, answer due 8/20/2020. (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pro-Troll Inc.. Proking Spoon LLC served on 7/30/2020, answer due 8/20/2020. (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Peter Tormey as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMG) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KMDA, Inc., Proking Spoon LLC. (MMG) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 5th Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 20-cv-1576 ECT/LIB. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number BMNDC-7882257) filed by Pro-Troll Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - D, DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR/LEFT VM #2 Notice of Patent Action to PTO DIrector, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Christensen, Carl) Modified text on 7/15/2020 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.