Evans et al v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
Tanya Hunter and Landon Evans |
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus |
0:2020cv01617 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Eric C Tostrud |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative and Additional Defenses filed by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. (Mathisen, Eric) |
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Eric Peter Mathisen for American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/26/2020. (NAH) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric P. Mathisen. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7997714 filed by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. (Moen, Brian) |
Filing 10 ORDER on #8 Stipulation,. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus response due 9/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/21/2020.(TMA) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation,. (Moen, Brian) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, 2nd Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. Jointly Signed by Landon Evans and Tanya Hunter. (Moen, Brian) |
Filing 7 ORDER on #5 Stipulation,. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus response due 8/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 7/24/2020.(TMA) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation,. (Moen, Brian) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. Jointly Signed by Landon Evans and Tanya Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Moen, Brian) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing William B. Madsen as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. cc: Attorney William B. Madsen. (CLK) |
Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-1617 ECT/ECW. (CLK) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. (Moen, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Redwood County District Court, case number Not filed yet (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7901942) filed by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Moen, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.