Thao v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Kimberly Thao |
Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
0:2020cv01657 |
July 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David S Doty |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/14/2020. TELEPHONIC Pretrial Conference set for 10/21/2020 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 9/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA) |
Filing 17 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union. (Olson, Ryan) Modified text on 9/9/2020 (MTP). |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union. (Olson, Ryan) Modified text on 9/9/2020 (MTP). |
Filing 13 ORDER on #10 Stipulation. Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union response due 9/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 7/31/2020.(TMA) |
Filing 12 ORDER on #6 Stipulation. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. response due 9/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 7/31/2020.(TMA) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation. (Olson, Ryan) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union. Jointly Signed by Kimberly Thao. (Olson, Ryan) |
Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union. (Olson, Ryan) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Taylor Grode for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 7/30/2020. (NAH) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Kimberly Thao. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-1657 DSD/ECW. (CLK) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Taylor Grode. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7922154, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Taylor Grode. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7922154 filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Anoka County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7922102) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Consent Form Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.