Bujak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Alexander Bujak |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 0:2020cv01838 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 11/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 10/19/2020. (HAM)
|
| Filing 18 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Hoglund, Lauren) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
| Filing 16 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Kaluza, Kristina) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Kaluza, Kristina) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER on #12 Stipulation. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer due 10/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/22/2020. (HAM)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Kaluza, Kristina) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE DEFEND by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Jointly Signed by Alexander Bujak. (Kaluza, Kristina) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 10/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/21/2020. (HAM)
|
| Filing 10 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Hoglund, Lauren) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexander Bujak. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 9/2/2020, answer due 9/23/2020. (Dunn, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexander Bujak. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. served on 9/1/2020, answer due 9/22/2020. (Dunn, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (MMP) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 20-cv-1838 (JRT/TNL). (MMP) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna Dakroub on behalf of Alexander Bujak. (Dakroub, Jenna) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Dunn on behalf of Alexander Bujak. (Dunn, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7997930) filed by Alexander Bujak. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dunn, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
