Fukita v. Gist et al
Plaintiff: Tomoko Fukita
Defendant: Joshua Gist and Deborah Starr
Case Number: 0:2020cv01869
Filed: August 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Leo I Brisbois
Referring Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE Regarding Extension of Deadline for Answers by Tomoko Fukita (McLawsen, Gregory) Modified text on 9/23/2020 (MMP).
September 14, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tomoko Fukita. Joshua Gist served on 9/1/2020, answer due 9/22/2020. (McLawsen, Gregory)
September 2, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tomoko Fukita. Deborah Starr served on 9/2/2020, answer due 9/23/2020. (McLawsen, Gregory)
September 2, 2020 Filing 7 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - Return of Service Executed for Summons and Complaint served on Deborah Starr on 9/2/2020, filed by Tomoko Fukita. (McLawsen, Gregory) Modified text on 9/2/2020 (MMP).
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Gregory McLawsen for Tomoko Fukita. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 9/1/2020. (NAH)
August 31, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Joshua Gist, Deborah Starr. (MMG)
August 31, 2020 Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 6th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 20-cv-1869 SRN/LIB. (MMG)
August 28, 2020 Filing 3 EXHIBIT List re #1 Complaint, filed by Tomoko Fukita. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) I-864 of Primary Sponsor, #2 Exhibit(s) I-864 of Joint Sponsor, #3 Exhibit(s) I-94, #4 Exhibit(s) I-130, #5 Exhibit(s) I-485, #6 Exhibit(s) Cover Letters, #7 Exhibit(s) LPR Card, #8 Exhibit(s) I-751)(Ratkowski, Nicholas)
August 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gregory Hortman McLawsen. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8010732 filed by Tomoko Fukita. (Ratkowski, Nicholas)
August 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joshua Gist, Deborah Starr (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8010625) filed by Tomoko Fukita. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ratkowski, Nicholas) Modified text on 8/31/2020 (MMG).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fukita v. Gist et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Gist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah Starr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomoko Fukita
Represented By: Nicholas Ratkowski
Represented By: Gregory McLawsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?