Wright v. Greiner
| Jon Q. Wright doing business as JQ Licensing, LLC |
| Molly Greiner doing business as Lake Winnie's Gosh Dam Place |
| 0:2020cv01878 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Molly Greiner. (Warner, Stephen) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE/SUBSTITUTION for Molly Greiner. (Warner, Stephen) |
Filing 13
ORDER approving #11 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer. Molly Greiner answer due 10/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 10/15/2020. (JLB)
|
| Filing 12 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Non-Compliance with #Local Rule 7.1 Civil Motion Practice for #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by attorney Eric Menhart. Proposed Order not emailed to the Judge in word processing format. Please file according to the rule and contact the appropriate chambers if further direction is needed. (JLB) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Molly Greiner. (Menhart, Eric) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Eric Menhart for Molly Greiner. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 9/25/2020. (NAH)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric Menhart. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8085964 filed by Molly Greiner. (Essien, Michael) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jon Q. Wright. Molly Greiner served on 9/18/2020, answer due 10/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Hansen, Nathan) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Dmitry Lapin for Jon Q. Wright. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 9/3/2020. (NAH)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Dmitry Lapin. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8018580 filed by Jon Q. Wright. (Hansen, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON FILING OF COPYRIGHT ACTION (The Clerk's Office will mail a copy of the AO 121 and the Complaint to the U.S Copyright Office.). (Hansen, Nathan) cc: U.S. Copyright Office. (kt) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Dmitry Lapin as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (lmb) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Molly Greiner. (lmb) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (5th - Copyright, Trademark) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Molly Greiner (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8015134) filed by Jon Q. Wright. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Hansen, Nathan) Modified text on 9/1/2020 (kt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
