Peters v. Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota
Plaintiff: Brian Peters
Defendant: Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc. doing business as Keystone Treatment Center
Case Number: 0:2020cv01973
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David S Doty
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #15 Stipulation,. (Haigh, Mark)
November 12, 2020 Filing 15 STIPULATION re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Brian Peters, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Tyler Peters, Decedent. (Haigh, Mark)
November 12, 2020 Filing 14 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Cancelation of Hearing: #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction : Motion Hearing set for 11/30/2020 at 02:00 PM in Judge's Chambers 14W (MPLS) before Senior Judge David S. Doty is hereby stricken from the calendar. (DLO)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Regarding Dispositive Motion Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 9/25/2020.(DLO)
September 24, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction : Motion Hearing set for 11/30/2020 at 02:00 PM in Judge's Chambers 14W (MPLS) before Senior Judge David S. Doty. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc..(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 10 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc.. (Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 9 LR7.1/LR72.2 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc. re #5 Memorandum in Support of Motion,. (Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #4 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc..(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Aimee Scholten in SUPPORT OF #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc..(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of John Stamp in SUPPORT OF #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc..(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc..(Haigh, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc.. (Haigh, Mark)
September 16, 2020 Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Ryan W.W. Redd as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (CLK)
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-1973 DSD/ECW. (CLK)
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8060728) filed by Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota d/b/a Keystone Treatment Center. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice to State Court of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Haigh, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Peters
Represented By: R Daniel Rasmus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc. doing business as Keystone Treatment Center
Represented By: Mark W. Haigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?