Pridgen v. 651 Carpets, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Pridgen
Defendant: Cherry Cournoyer, Brett Cournoyer and 651 Carpets, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2020cv01987
Filed: September 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 12/1/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/1/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 12/8/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TJB)
October 14, 2020 Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendants 651 Carpets, Inc., Brett Cournoyer, Cherry Cournoyer. (Tentinger, Ross)
October 8, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by 651 Carpets, Inc., Brett Cournoyer, Cherry Cournoyer. (Tentinger, Ross)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ross Tentinger on behalf of All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 FILED IN ERROR. INSTRUCTED TO REFILE: Defednant 651 Carpet's Corporate Disclosure)(Tentinger, Ross) Modified text on 10/9/2020 (MTP).
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 651 Carpets, Inc., Brett Cournoyer, Cherry Cournoyer. (MMP)
September 17, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd 4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-1987 (NEB/DTS). (MMP)
September 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 651 Carpets, Inc., Brett Cournoyer, Cherry Cournoyer (filing fee $400, receipt number AMNDC-8065250) filed by William Pridgen. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kramer, Samuel) Modified text on 9/17/2020 (MMP). Modified text on 9/17/2020 (lmb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pridgen v. 651 Carpets, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cherry Cournoyer
Represented By: Ross Tentinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brett Cournoyer
Represented By: Ross Tentinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 651 Carpets, Inc.
Represented By: Ross Tentinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Pridgen
Represented By: Joshua A Newville
Represented By: Samuel Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?