Hart v. Sedgwick 3M Company
Plaintiff: Susan Hart
Defendant: Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program and 3M Company
Case Number: 0:2020cv02041
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Tony N Leung
Referring Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
2 Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: based on the parties #6 Stipulation; 1. The Parties request is GRANTED. 2. All claims against Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program are dismissed without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to any party. 3. 3M Company is hereby substituted as the named Defendant in this lawsuit and the case caption shall be amended to reflect this change. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/16/2020.(MMP)
November 13, 2020 Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (Berens, Barbara)
November 13, 2020 Filing 6 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Substitute Named Defendant by Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program. Jointly Signed by Susan Hart. (Berens, Barbara)
October 15, 2020 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Susan Hart. Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program waiver sent on 9/24/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. (McCartin, Joseph)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 20-CV-2041 (SRN/TNL). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 9/24/2020.(MMP)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program. (MMP)
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-2041 (SRN/ECW). (MMP)
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8082660) filed by Susan Hart. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (McCartin, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hart v. Sedgwick 3M Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Hart
Represented By: Stephen J Fields
Represented By: Joseph McCartin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sedgwick CMS/3M Disability Program
Represented By: Barbara P Berens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Barbara P Berens
Represented By: Erin K Fogarty Lisle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?