Briones v. 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: Marco Briones
Defendant: Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Case Number: 0:2020cv02042
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Filing 15 DECLARATION of Benjamin W. Hulse in Opposition to #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit(s) Exibit 17, #18 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 29)(Hulse, Benjamin)
November 13, 2020 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Hulse, Benjamin)
October 23, 2020 Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Marco Briones.(Gustafson, Daniel)
October 23, 2020 Filing 12 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #9 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Marco Briones.(Gustafson, Daniel)
October 23, 2020 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Marco Briones. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Gustafson, Daniel)
October 23, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court : Date and time to be determined. (Gustafson, Daniel)
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Marco Briones. (Gustafson, Daniel)
September 29, 2020 Filing 8 Defendants' 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC's ANSWER to Complaint filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. (Hulse, Benjamin)
September 25, 2020 Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Aearo Technologies LLC. (Rashid, Faris)
September 25, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE by Aearo Technologies LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, CONSENT TO REMOVAL (Rashid, Faris)
September 24, 2020 Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Richard M. Paul III, Ashlea G. Schwarz as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (KDS)
September 24, 2020 Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per MDL Direct Assign list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-2042 JRT/KMM. (KDS)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 3M Company re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Hulse, Benjamin)
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant 3M Company. (Hulse, Benjamin)
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8082711) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hulse, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Briones v. 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aearo Technologies LLC
Represented By: Faris Rashid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Benjamin W Hulse
Represented By: Jerry W Blackwell
Represented By: S Jamal Faleel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Briones
Represented By: Alicia N Sieben
Represented By: William R Sieben
Represented By: Amanda M Williams
Represented By: Matthew James Barber
Represented By: Daniel E Gustafson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?