Giant Snacks, Inc. v. Spiekermeier
Giant Snacks, Inc. |
Lucy Spiekermeier |
0:2020cv02096 |
October 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Paul A Magnuson |
David T Schultz |
Fraud |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 12/8/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/8/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 12/15/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)Notice to Public: Please visit our website at #https://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/court-schedules for audio connection information for this hearing. Note that hearings may not appear on the kiosk until one week before the hearing date.(TJB) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Amended Complaint filed by Lucy Spiekermeier. (Stock, Robert) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Giant Snacks, Inc. re #9 Amended Complaint (Koneck, Robert) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert B Stock on behalf of Lucy Spiekermeier. (Stock, Robert) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lucy Spiekermeier. filed by Giant Snacks, Inc.. No summons requested. (Koneck, Robert) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Giant Snacks, Inc.. Lucy Spiekermeier served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Koneck, Robert) |
Filing 7 Order in re Dispositive Motion Practice. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 10/7/2020.(LLM) Modified text on 10/7/2020 (CLK). Modified text on 10/7/2020 (CLK). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lucy Spiekermeier. (MMG) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-2096 PAM/DTS. (MMG) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Giant Snacks, Inc.. (Koneck, Robert) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert John Koneck on behalf of Giant Snacks, Inc.. (Koneck, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lucy Spiekermeier (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8106518) filed by Giant Snacks, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Koneck, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Giant Snacks, Inc. v. Spiekermeier | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lucy Spiekermeier | |
Represented By: | Charlotte Rusch |
Represented By: | Robert B Stock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Giant Snacks, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert John Koneck |
Represented By: | Judith Bevis Langevin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.