King v. Bey et al
Reginald Marlon King |
Timothy James Walz, Steven Terner Mnuchin, Andrew Marshall Saul, R. Frank Weidner, Donald James Trump and Michael Richard Pompeo |
Naa'El Saddiq Malik Bey |
0:2020cv02100 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David S Doty |
Katherine M Menendez |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MMP) |
![]() |
Filing 4 LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE JOHN R. TUNHEIM by Reginald Marlon King. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kt) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Reginald Marlon King and #1 Complaint filed by Reginald Marlon King. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/22/2020. (KAT) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Reginald Marlon King. (JGK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven Terner Mnuchin, Michael Richard Pompeo, Andrew Marshall Saul, Donald James Trump, Timothy James Walz, R. Frank Weidner filed by Reginald Marlon King. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Kate M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.