Sezzle Inc. v. ViaBill, Inc.
| Sezzle Inc. |
| ViaBill, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv02104 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER on #13 Stipulation. ViaBill, Inc. answer due 12/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 11/25/2020.(JLB)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 Stipulation. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Move in Response to Complaint by Sezzle Inc.. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER on #10 Stipulation. ViaBill, Inc. answer due 11/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 11/10/2020.(JLB)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Move in Response to Complaint by Sezzle Inc.. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
| (Text-Only) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR: 9 Order on Stipulation. Document #8 is the correct Order on Stipulation. (MKB) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER on #6 Stipulation. ViaBill, Inc. answer due 11/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 11/2/2020.(JLB)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Move in Response to Complaint by Sezzle Inc.. (Merrick, Cassandra) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Sezzle Inc. re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint (Merrick, Cassandra) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 20-cv-02104 PJS/LIB. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/5/2020.(MTP)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ViaBill, Inc. (lmb) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-2104 (PJS/DTS). (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ViaBill, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8109890) filed by Sezzle Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Madel, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sezzle Inc. v. ViaBill, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ViaBill, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sezzle Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher W. Madel |
| Represented By: | Cassandra B. Merrick |
| Represented By: | Jennifer M Robbins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
