Petrovich v. Essentia Health Miller Dwan et al
| Bryce Joseph Petrovich |
| Essentia Health, Eli Hilst and Essentia Health Miller Dwan |
| 0:2020cv02273 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| John R Tunheim |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bryce Joseph Petrovich. (CLK) |
| Filing 11 (Text-Only) NOTICE TO ATTORNEY regarding Dispositive Motions briefing schedule: All dispositive motions must comply with Local Rule 7.1(c). Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed with the Court on or before 21 days after the service of the supporting memorandum to the original motion. Replies to responsive briefs shall be filed 14 days after the service of the response to the dispositive motion. Upon the motion being fully briefed and filed, counsel for the moving party shall email Chief Judge Tunheims chambers at Tunheim_Chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov to request a hearing date. Upon receiving from Chief Judge Tunheims Courtroom Deputy a hearing date, time and location, the moving party shall file the amended notice of hearing at that time. (HAZ) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, #8 Meet and Confer Statement, #9 Proposed Order to Judge, #6 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #7 Memorandum in Support of Motion, (Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan.(Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #5 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan.(Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure : Date and time to be determined. (Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss/General Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan. (Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan re #3 Notice of Appearance (Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy A Schramm on behalf of Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan. (Schramm, Tracy) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Bryce Joseph Petrovich. (MMP) Document QC'd on 12/10/2020 (MKB). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Essentia Health, Essentia Health Miller Dwan, Eli Hilst (IFP Pending) filed by Bryce Joseph Petrovich. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 5th Division Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (MMP) Document QC'd on 12/10/2020 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
