Holloway v. Minnesota
Petitioner: Christopher Lee Holloway
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Case Number: 0:2020cv02334
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Michael J Davis
Referring Judge: Becky R Thorson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 EXHIBIT List in opposition to re #2 Memorandum filed by State of Minnesota. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7, #8 Exhibit(s) 8, #9 Exhibit(s) 9, #10 Exhibit(s) 10, #11 Exhibit(s) 11, #12 Exhibit(s) 12, #13 Exhibit(s) 13, #14 Exhibit(s) 14, #15 Exhibit(s) 15, #16 Exhibit(s) 16, #17 Exhibit(s) 17, #18 Exhibit(s) 18, #19 Exhibit(s) 19, #20 Exhibit(s) 20, #21 Exhibit(s) 21, #22 Exhibit(s) 22, #23 Exhibit(s) 23)(Haase, James)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Answer and Memorandum of Law Opposing Habeas Relief in RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by State of Minnesota. (Haase, James)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James E Haase on behalf of State of Minnesota. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Haase, James)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/20/2020.(JGS)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by State of Minnesota Attorney Substitution (Corrected Version). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution (Corrected Version))(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by State of Minnesota Attorney Substitution. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution)(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd, 4th Prisioner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 20-cv-2334 (MJD/BRT). (KNK)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum in Support of Petition filed by Christopher Lee Holloway. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Addendum)(Gerdts, Daniel)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $ 5, receipt number AMNDC-8225544) filed by Christopher Lee Holloway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gerdts, Daniel) Modified text on 11/16/2020 (KNK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holloway v. Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Lee Holloway
Represented By: Daniel L Gerdts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: James E Haase
Represented By: Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?