3M Company v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
Plaintiff: 3M Company
Defendant: Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
Case Number: 0:2020cv02348
Filed: November 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Tony N Leung
Referring Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2020 Filing 26 NOTICE by 3M Company (Regarding Attempts to Meet and Confer) (Dunlop, Sybil)
December 8, 2020 NOTICE OF DOCKETING CORRECTION for #7 Declaration in Support: Exhibit 1 rescanned to include color photo. (kt)
December 8, 2020 NOTICE OF DOCKETING CORRECTION for #1 Complaint: Exhibits 1-7 rescanned to include color photos. (kt)
December 8, 2020 NOTICE OF DOCKETING CORRECTION for #6 Declaration in Support: Main document rescanned to include missing page and Exhibit 7 rescanned to include color photos. (kt)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #21 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David E. Armendariz for 3M Company; granting #22 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alexandra Bistline for 3M Company. Approved by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/23/2020. (NAH)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting #3 Motion for TRO, Motion for an Order Temporarily Restraining Defendants' Assets, Motion for Limited Expedited Discovery. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/20/2020. (avt)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Christopher Mark Weimer for 3M Company. Approved by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/19/2020. (NAH)
November 19, 2020 Filing 22 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Alexandra H. Bistline. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8235397 filed by 3M Company. (Dunlop, Sybil)
November 19, 2020 Filing 21 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David E. Armendariz. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8235372 filed by 3M Company. (Dunlop, Sybil)
November 19, 2020 Filing 20 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Dunlop, Sybil)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 20-cv-2348 (SRN/TNL). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/18/2020.(MMP)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #9 MOTION to SEAL #2 Exhibit, #6 Declaration in Support. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/18/2020. (SMD)
November 18, 2020 Filing 17 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Alexandra Bistline, David Armendariz as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (CLK)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCUMENT FILED IN WRONG CASE-DOCUMENT RESTRICTED. ORDER granting #9 Motion to Seal #6 Declaration in Support, #2 Exhibit. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/18/2020. (CLK) Modified text on 11/18/2020 (CLK).
November 17, 2020 Filing 15 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff 3M Company. (CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher M. Weimer (filing fee $100, receipt number 44641109226) filed by 3M Company. (CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 13 STATEMENT INSTEAD OF REDACTED DOCUMENT: Entire Document Confidential for #6 , 3 Sealed Document(s) - #2 SEALED EXHIBIT Schedule A to Complaint, #6 SEALED Declaration of Michael L. Gannon, [6-1][6-2][6-3][6-4][6-5][6-6][6-7][6-8][6-9][6-10][6-11] Sealed Exhibits 1-7 filed by 3M Company.(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 MOTION to SEAL #2 Exhibit, #6 Declaration in Support, filed by 3M Company.(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to SEAL #2 Exhibit, #6 Declaration in Support, filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION to SEAL #2 Exhibit, #6 Declaration in Support, : Date and time to be determined. (CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to SEAL #2 Exhibit Schedul A, #6 Declaration in Support and Exhibits, filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(CLK) Untermed motion on 11/18/2020 (CLK).
November 17, 2020 Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re 3 EX PARTE Motion filed by 3M Company.(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 7 Declaration of Charles Stobbie in Support of 3 EX PARTE Motion filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1)(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 6 SEALED Declaration of Michael L. Gannon in Support of 3 EX PARTE Motion filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Exhibit 1, #2 Sealed Exhibit 2, #3 Sealed Exhibit 3, #4 Sealed Exhibit 4, #5 Sealed Exhibit 5, #6 Sealed Exhibit 6, #7 Sealed Exhibit 7, #8 Sealed Exhibit 7-2, #9 Sealed Exhibit 7-3, #10 Sealed Exhibit 7-4, #11 Sealed Exhibit 7-5)(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re 3 EX PARTE Motion filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION 3 EX PARTE Motion : Date and time to be determined. (CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBIT Schedule A to Complaint re #1 Complaint, by 3M Company. (CLK)
November 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A (filing fee $400, receipt number 44641109226) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Copyright, Trademark) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1-7, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (CLK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 3M Company v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 3M Company
Represented By: Sybil L Dunlop
Represented By: Jenny Gassman-Pines
Represented By: Christopher Mark Weimer
Represented By: David E. Armendariz
Represented By: Alexandra Bistline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?