Westfield Outdoor, Inc. v. Simple Sourcing LLC
| Westfield Outdoor, Inc. |
| Simple Sourcing LLC |
| 0:2020cv02358 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| David T Schultz |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 3/2/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/2/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 3/9/2021 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 1/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)Notice to Public: Please visit our website at #https://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/court-schedules for audio connection information for this hearing. Note that hearings may not appear on the kiosk until one week before the hearing date.(TJB)
|
| Filing 14 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Simple Sourcing LLC. (Myers, Aaron) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Simple Sourcing LLC. (Myers, Aaron) Modified text/link on 1/12/2021 (lmb). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER on #10 Stipulation. Simple Sourcing LLC answer due 1/11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 12/4/2020.(TJB)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation. (Abide, Leland) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION For Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Simple Sourcing LLC. Jointly Signed by Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. (Abide, Leland) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Matthew A. Braunel for Westfield Outdoor, Inc.; granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael Lee Nepple for Westfield Outdoor, Inc.; granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David B. Jinkins for Westfield Outdoor, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/20/2020. (NAH)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David B. Jinkins. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8237340 filed by Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael L. Nepple. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8237333 filed by Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Matthew A. Braunel. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8237320 filed by Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Plaintiff Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Simple Sourcing LLC. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd 4th Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-2358 (SRN/DTS). (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Simple Sourcing LLC (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8236550) filed by Westfield Outdoor, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1-4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dayhoff, Aimee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
