Kashmark et al v. PreferredOne Administrative Services, Inc.
Kimberley Purvis, Marilyn Kunkel and Mary Kashmark |
PreferredOne Administrative Services, Inc. |
0:2020cv02376 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
Patrick J Schiltz |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(CLK) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Approval of Settlement. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 11/25/2020. (CLG) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #1 MOTION for Approval of Settlement filed by PreferredOne Administrative Services, Inc..(McGrane, Sara) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-02376 PJS/KMM. (MTP) |
Filing 1 JOINT MOTION for Approval of FLSA Release and Settlement Agreement against Mary Kashmark, Marilyn Kunkel, Kimberley Purvis (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8247568) filed by PreferredOne Administrative Services, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Settlement Agreement, #2 FILED IN ERROR. DIRECTED TO REFILE: Exhibit(s) B - Proposed Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (McGrane, Sara) Modified text on 11/24/2020 (MTP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.