Sorensen v. Bastian et al
| Charles Randall Sorensen |
| Delta F-Care Retirement, Trust and Edward H Bastian |
| 0:2020cv02389 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Edward H Bastian, Delta F-Care Retirement, Trust filed by Charles Randall Sorensen. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). cc: Charles Randall Sorensen. (MTP) Document QC'd on 12/30/2020 (CLK). |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to File Certain Documents Conventionally. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 12/2/2020. (JEN)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Edward H Bastian, Delta F-Care Retirement, Trust. (NAH) cc: Sorensen w/ info sheet. Modified text on 11/25/2020 (NAH). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS CONVENTIONALLY filed by Charles Randall Sorensen. (NAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward H Bastian, Delta F-Care Retirement, Trust (filing fee $400, receipt number 34641016100) filed by Charles Randall Sorensen. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (NAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
