Schuler v. Dhillon et al
Plaintiff: Anna Schuler
Defendant: Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD. and Balwinder Dhillon
Case Number: 0:2020cv02544
Filed: December 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Referring Judge: David S Doty
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2021 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD., Balwinder Dhillon. Jointly Signed by Anna Schuler.(Burke, Michael)
January 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Burke on behalf of Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD., Balwinder Dhillon. (Burke, Michael)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/4/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 2/11/2021 at 03:45 PM by Conference Bridge (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 1/8/2021. (Attachment: #1 Consent Form)(JMK)
January 7, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M Montpetit on behalf of Anna Schuler. (Montpetit, Jeffrey)
January 3, 2021 Filing 5 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have been recently revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (JMK)
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 20-cv-2544 (DSD/HB). (lmb)
December 16, 2020 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD., Balwinder Dhillon. (Wood, Brian)
December 16, 2020 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD., Balwinder Dhillon. (Wood, Brian)
December 16, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8314375) filed by Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD., Balwinder Dhillon. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Wood, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schuler v. Dhillon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Bros. Transport, LTD.
Represented By: Brian A Wood
Represented By: Michael T. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Balwinder Dhillon
Represented By: Brian A Wood
Represented By: Michael T. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Schuler
Represented By: Jeffrey M Montpetit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?