Weisen v. Genuine Parts Company
Jeffrey Weisen |
Genuine Parts Company doing business as NAPA Auto Parts |
0:2021cv00071 |
January 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Jeffrey Weisen.(Michenfelder, Patrick) |
Filing 8 (Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. In recognition of the current efforts locally and nationally to protect persons from unnecessary potential exposure to COVID-19, the Pretrial Scheduling Conference in this case will be held by telephone. A call-in number will be provided by the Court. The parties are not required to conduct any applicable meet and confers in person. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 2171. (HAM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 3/22/2021 at 10:00 AM in Judge's Chambers 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 2/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint Amended filed by Genuine Parts Company. (Wilk, David) |
Filing 5 ORDER on #3 Stipulation. The time for Defendant Genuine Parts Company to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in the above-entitled matter shall be extended to January 29, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 1/15/2021. (HAM) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #3 Stipulation. (Wilk, David) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer Complaint by Genuine Parts Company. Jointly Signed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Weisen. (Wilk, David) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Civil Rights Housing/Accomodations ADA Other list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-71 (SRN/TNL). (MMP) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ramsey County District Court, case number Unknown (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8378299) filed by Genuine Parts Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit(s) 3 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilk, David) Modified text on 1/8/2021 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Weisen v. Genuine Parts Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company doing business as NAPA Auto Parts | |
Represented By: | Pat O'Neill, III |
Represented By: | David M Wilk |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Weisen | |
Represented By: | Chad Throndset |
Represented By: | Patrick W Michenfelder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.