Maxamuud v. Tritten et al
Liiban Maxamuud |
Leslie Tritten, Ken Cuccinelli and Pete Gaynor |
0:2021cv00090 |
January 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David T Schultz |
John R Tunheim |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1421 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Ken Cuccinelli answer due 3/26/2021; Pete Gaynor answer due 3/26/2021; Leslie Tritten answer due 3/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/3/2021.(TJB) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Ken Cuccinelli, Pete Gaynor, Leslie Tritten. Jointly Signed by Liban Maxamuud. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Friedrich A. P. Siekert on behalf of Ken Cuccinelli, Pete Gaynor, Leslie Tritten. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ken Cuccinelli, Pete Gaynor, Leslie Tritten. (MKB) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-90 (JRT/DTS). (MKB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8385675) filed by Liiban Maxamuud. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.